PharmD · Colorado

Collaborative Practice Agreement for Pharmacists in Colorado

Yes, a written physician agreement is required. Colorado calls it a Collaborative Pharmacy Practice Agreement.

Practice authoritySupervision required
Written agreementAgreement required
What Colorado calls itCollaborative Pharmacy Practice Agreement
Governing boardColorado State Board of Pharmacy
Agreement familyCollaborative Practice
Research date2026-08-20 · clauses 2026-09-03

Represents Colorado's collaborative pharmacy practice tier (C.R.S. §§ 12-280-601–604; 3 CCR 719-1-17.00.00) — a voluntary, written agreement with one or more physicians or APRNs granting protocol-based drug-therapy authority. Pharmacists qualify with a PharmD or ≥5 years' licensed experience (§ 12-280-602). Unlike Texas, the Pharmacy Board's own CDTM rule (fetched directly) confirms no facility-setting restriction (FQHC/hospital-only) applies.

What the collaboration must look like

The rules the physician relationship has to follow. Each fact comes from the statute or board rule listed under sources.

Proximity

Not codified — left to the agreement

Supervision ratio

Not codified — no cap on file

Chart review

Not codified — left to the agreement

Meeting cadence

Annually

3 CCR 719-1-17.00.00 (fetched directly): the written collaborative-practice agreement itself 'shall be reviewed annually, and revised, if necessary' — a protocol-review cadence, not a chart-review quota. The same rule also requires 'a process ... for the prescriber and pharmacist to communicate and document changes to the patient's medical record,' but sets no fixed frequency for that beyond the annual agreement review.

Prescriptive authority

Covered by the practice agreement · controlled substances permitted

No confirmation found of Schedule II authority under any Colorado pharmacist collaborative-practice pathway.

Written agreement

Required

Required only for the expanded 'collaborative pharmacy practice' scope tracked here (protocol-based drug therapy management, § 12-280-601 et seq.) — ordinary dispensing under a pharmacist's base license needs no such agreement at all.

Practice ownership (corporate practice of medicine)

Non-licensee ownership permitted — Colorado does not require pharmacy ownership by a licensed pharmacist — a prescription drug outlet need only be under the 'charge' of a designated pharmacist-manager (§ 12-280-118), regardless of who owns the business.

A secondary source (unconfirmed against primary § 12-280 statute text in this pass) described an additional cap limiting a prescriber-owner's interest in a pharmacy to 10% where that prescriber is also employed to dispense — not included above pending verification of the citation.

Legal sources for these rules (5)
The document: Collaborative Pharmacy Practice Agreement
What a Colorado Collaborative Pharmacy Practice Agreement must contain, who governs it and who signs: read the Collaborative Pharmacy Practice Agreement page on practiceagreement.com.

What a collaborating physician costs here

Typical monthly cost in Colorado

$500$600

Estimate for one Pharmacist. Standard-tier state.

About Colorado's rules

Colorado is a full-practice-authority state for all five APRN roles (NP/PMHNP/CRNA/CNM/CNS) — no physician agreement is ever required to practice. APRNs instead face a 750-hour prescribing mentorship (not necessarily physician-led) before 'full' (vs. 'provisional') prescriptive authority — a credentialing gate, not a supervision relationship. PAs moved from physician 'supervision' to an hours-gated 'collaborative agreement' under SB23-083 (2023) — not 'HB23-1214,' which could not be located and appears to be a misattribution. Colorado licenses estheticians; it has not deregulated the profession.

Other clinicians in Colorado: see the state overview.